Latest posts:
Rate this!
David Partington
Member - 12 posts
Jane I think there was a competitive bidding scheme between the two companies running the scheme and CORGI lost, I'm afraid
Rate this!
David Partington
Member - 12 posts
Carl, I wonder why anyone thought this was a good idea? Without a lock. With a lock then this situation would be ok. Why not simply ask for a look and this should resolve all matters of decency/ modesty.
Rate this!
David Partington
Member - 12 posts
Ian I was intrigued by your question and had a look. This might be what you are looking for.
Regards
http://www.highwayelectrical.org.uk/ASLEC/downloads/Specification_for_G39_Training.pdf
Rate this!
David Partington
Member - 12 posts
I suspect that you will find that staff who are authorised to work on the tracks have a specific hat colouring, thereby making it easier for suppervisors to quickly determine that the staff that are working in that area have had the appropriate training to be there.
Rate this!
David Partington
Member - 12 posts
T M
I have worked in similar circumstances in the past and I see what your issues are, especially where staff are sleeping on site and may have limited privacy.
The simple answer is that there is no requirerment to provide a seperate toilet for staff, only that one is provided.
A solution may be found via an agreement with the client whereby he/ she agrees to use only their on - suite facilities, though depending on the lay out of the site this may not be a practicle solution, negotiation is the only remedy I am afraid.
regards
David Partington
Rate this!
David Partington
Member - 12 posts
Tony, I am a HS manager with care homes amongst others units, within social housing.
I do not think there is a legal requirement to provide toilets in care homes. We do, but this is only for the convenience of the visitors not a legal requirement.
Regards
David Partington.
Rate this!
David Partington
Member - 12 posts
Kuang, people in mental health institutions are un-well why would you wish to add to their anxieties by removing their tobacco? Whilst allowing felons to continue to smoke?
What a government...
Rate this!
David Partington
Member - 12 posts
I am the HS Manager with a large Housing authority and have over twenty sheltered unit sites. Recently we needed to have a lift upgraded and was quite comfortable about having a chair lift in situ as the stairs were over two metres wide and I therefore took the view that the tenants could escape at need. Not to have installed a chair lift would have left over thirty people as virtuel prisioners in their home over a two week period and this was clearly unaceptable to both the tenants and myself.
I note that you also work for a LA therefore can you not refer this matter to your own health and safety team as they will find a balanced resolution to this issue for you.
Rate this!
David Partington
Member - 12 posts
Phil can you not simply find assistance from staff on the ground floor, or is this too obvious?
Regards
David.
Rate this!
David Partington
Member - 12 posts
Julian of course you are right in your approach to the treatment of the pests. The question was "what is the legal requirement". And there appears to be very little. However on reflection if there were an infestation of say of fleas then one might have some redress via the Tort of Negligence due to forseeability of discomfort, infestion of home et al... Just a thought.
Rate this!
David Partington
Member - 12 posts
Steve your question is intriguing, so I had a look and I could find nothing specific ( I expected to find something in the Welfare Regs 1992) however, if I was arguing this from a shop stewards point of view then I would argue:
2.?( 1) It shall be the duty of every employer to ensure, so
of employers far as is reasonably practicable, the health, safety and welfare at work of all his employees.
HASWA 1974
With the emphasis on welfare
Rate this!
David Partington
Member - 12 posts
Charles I assume that you are in Housing. The contractors that you invite onto site must meet statute requirerments or you leave your firm liable for damages as they are your agents. Therefore ensure that your contracts with these people are explicit in this.
Where tenants invite contractors onto your site into their properties then you have no control and no liabilities.
0 (0)
