Workplace Law Network The membership site for UK employers and managers, specialising in employment law, health and safety and premises management
Only a few places left on this year's must attend facilities management conference
PPA awards Workplace Law business website of the year (paid for)
  • NETWORK
  • TRAINING
  • CONSULTING
  • BOOKSHOP
  • HOME
    • ABOUT MEMBERSHIP
    • ABOUT US
  • LATEST
    • NEWS
    • CASES
    • BRIEFINGS
    • AUDIO
    • EBULLETINS
    • WHAT THE PAPERS SAY
    • NETWORK NEWS
  • INFO CENTRE
    • WHITE PAPERS
    • FACTSHEETS
    • MAGAZINE
    • POLICIES & PROCEDURES
    • SPECIAL REPORTS
    • GUIDES
    • REGULATION FINDER
  • ADVICE CENTRE
    • ONLINE ADVICE
    • TELEPHONE ADVICE
  • FORUMS & GROUPS
    • FORUMS
    • GROUPS
  • MEMBERSHIP
    • MY PROFILE
    • SPECIAL OFFERS
    • MEMBERSHIP STATUS
  • SHOP
  • CONTACT
  • LOG IN
  • or Register now
  • You are here:
  • Network
  • Forums & Groups

Comments by Anne McAllister

Latest posts:

Send message

Not rated yet
Rate this!
5 Dec 2008 12:43AM

Anne McAllister
Member - 166 posts

H there,
Kind of depends on how old your son is.
Currently if he is under 18 and you are his main carer you are entitled to apply for parental leave and can take up to 18weeks for ech child.
http://www.gov.im/lib/docs/dti/employmentRights/orders/parentalleaveregsfinal2007.doc
You will also find helpful info here...
http://www.cafamily.org.uk/families/rightsandentitlements/working/rightsinwork.html
http://www.dad.info/work/your-workplace-rights/special-circumstances-adoption-surrogacy-and-disabled-children/
http://www.worksmart.org.uk/rights/i_am_the_parent_of_a_disabled
http://www.direct.gov.uk/en/Parents/Moneyandworkentitlements/WorkAndFamilies/Parentalleaveandflexibleworking/DG_10029416

Hope you find these links helpful,



Not rated yet
Rate this!
5 Nov 2008 11:52AM

Anne McAllister
Member - 166 posts

My understanding is that the Tribunal system is about enforcing the law as it applies to employers not about taking sides.
Employers have the burden of proof because the duties of employers are fairly clear cut.
All employees are vulnerable.
Some more than others.
Employees are also required to provide adequate evidence of mistreatement and a tribunal is never the first avenue a worker will go down.
They have to have exhausted their employers own procedures beforehand.
With regards to non payment of awards I would have thought that the Tribunals decision was binding and further evidence of an employers belief that they are beyond employment legislation.



Not rated yet
Rate this!
5 Nov 2008 11:45AM

Anne McAllister
Member - 166 posts

Sympathise with wendy and the ID bracelet info but surely the bracelet would only be used if the children were lost or had no adult with them?
I dont feel anyone needs a mobile for personal use while at work.
The works phone number should always be given out to childminders ,nurseries,schools etc as a first port of call in any emergency situation and this gives the appropriate manager time and knowledge to arrange cover if necessary.
MObile workers can always be contacted by their line manager should a situatuion arise that they need to deal with personlly.
As for listening to music,texting friends,playing games etc on mobiles .....no way...you are not concentrating on your job and clearly not busy enough if you have time to do this.



Not rated yet
Rate this!
5 Nov 2008 11:38AM

Anne McAllister
Member - 166 posts

Depends what you were doing when captured John LOL
If the compnay policy clearly states no mobiles then no mobiles it should be.
There may be some exeptions so check out that policy carefully.
i.e. health and safety staff recording accidents or possible dangerous situations etc
You could also have been captured "accidently" but if no one is allowed a mobile at work how can this happen?



Not rated yet
Rate this!
5 Nov 2008 11:31AM

Anne McAllister
Member - 166 posts

Thats fine if you have a decent absence policy and dont negatively punish those who have been ill.
Some employers use their polcies as a weapon to constantly batter staff with and many workers are vulnerable in todays climate.



Not rated yet
Rate this!
5 Nov 2008 11:27AM

Anne McAllister
Member - 166 posts

Dont now about the legalities here but I can see why the tennants are not complying.
These mobility aids are massive and would be extremely difficult to fit in an average sized flat.
One wonders at the intelligence of housing mobility impared pople in high rise flats ?
How do they get out of the building in the event of a fire as lifts should not be used?
Presumably they go down in the lift on their scooters in normal circumstances but they would be effectively trapped inside a burning building if they are unable to use stairs to escape.
Perhaps individual risk assessmants need to be carruied out to ascertain who can and cant use the stairs but what would happen if someone cannot......surely this a potentially fatal accident waiting to happen.
The only solution would be to build an external lift shaft but could that be used in the event of a fire?

Allocating a section of the ground floor for parking wouldnt help as there would stil be a blockage hindering those leaving the building.



Not rated yet
Rate this!
26 Oct 2008 2:47PM

Anne McAllister
Member - 166 posts

While I disagree with management checking up on workers using social networking sites this has to be considered downright idiotic on the employees part.
Too many days are lost due to alcohol abuse and general malingering.



Not rated yet
Rate this!
24 Oct 2008 5:47PM

Anne McAllister
Member - 166 posts

Sorry Janet,
I thought the issue was that the company were telling managers that they could not go outside to smoke and that they worked 10hrs without a break ?
I Must have misunderstood.
Does that explain the misplaced enlightenment Kieran? :)



Not rated yet
Rate this!
20 Oct 2008 11:21AM

Anne McAllister
Member - 166 posts

Regarding trains and buses .....I cant remember the last time I got a seat on one of them so heaven knows how a wheelchair user would find the space to travel.



Not rated yet
Rate this!
18 Oct 2008 12:14PM

Anne McAllister
Member - 166 posts

I also lved right next to an airport and can vouch that the noise is incredible but as sheena says the rent was much cheaper than anywhere else.
The most annoying thing was that you would be watching a film and right at the end would be a comment or statement that confirmed the identity of the murderer or an explanation of a particular event and you were guaranteed that something would go overhead at that precise moment.



Not rated yet
Rate this!
18 Oct 2008 12:09PM

Anne McAllister
Member - 166 posts

It should all be clear in your no smoing at work policy and the situation you describe may be dependant on the industry you are in.
For example, there may be a clear risk if a manager is absent even for a short period.
Regrading breaks ....WTD .....
http://www.incomesdata.co.uk/information/worktimedirective.htm
Article 4 - Breaks
Member States shall take the measures necessary to ensure that, where the working day is longer than six hours, every worker is entitled to a rest break, the details of which, including duration and the terms of which it is granted, shall be laid down in collective agreements or agreements between the two sides of industry or, failing that, by national legislation.

http://www.healthcareworkforce.nhs.uk/working_time_directive/calling_time/legal_update.html
Rest Requirements

The rest requirements are enforced through employment tribunals (as are requirements for annual leave, among others). The rest requirements are:

11 hours continuous rest in every 24 hours,
Minimum 20 minute break when working time exceeds six hours
24 hours off in seven days or 48 hours off in 14 days.

(Regulations 10, 11 and 12)

If it is not possible to provide these rest breaks then compensatory rest should be given. Employers must ensure that workers are able to take rest breaks. If a worker finds their employer is unable to grant these rest breaks or compensatory rest they can take their case to an employment tribunal where a declaration and/or a compensation award may be given (Regulation 30).

I hope you find this helpful.



Not rated yet
Rate this!
16 Oct 2008 4:31PM

Anne McAllister
Member - 166 posts

Having suffered the torment of noisy neighbours I know how much proof would be needed to get to this stage.
While it seems mad the tenent must have indeed suffered but Id rahter have a cheerful,albeit noisy,butcher than drunken,violent layabouts to interupt my private life.



Not rated yet
Rate this!
16 Oct 2008 4:15PM

Anne McAllister
Member - 166 posts

As far as I am aware this is covered by TUPE.
Have a look at this.....
http://www.mundays.co.uk/pdf/industry/Franchise_Emp_Update.pdf
You may require legal advice urgently as it appears your manager is absolutely right....
"The TUPE Regulations have the following effects:
o transferring employees of the franchise unit, are entitled to continue to be employed on terms which are no less favourable than those on which they were previously employed."



Not rated yet
Rate this!
16 Oct 2008 3:53PM

Anne McAllister
Member - 166 posts

I would also add that Health and Safety is everyones business and in the workplace it would over ride any notion of discrimination .
I can see how the employee may be afraid/embarrassed about his uncontrolled diabetes but the employer has to ensure that the workplace is as safe as can be.
Rights have to be used in conjunction with responsibilty.
Where would the employer be if this gentleman died on premises following a collapse?



Not rated yet
Rate this!
7 Oct 2008 10:13AM

Anne McAllister
Member - 166 posts

Makes you wonder who was advising these 2?
Payment of full pay would indicate acceptance of liability....very dangerous admission in these days.



Not rated yet
Rate this!
6 Oct 2008 6:16PM

Anne McAllister
Member - 166 posts

Have a look at...
http://www.out-law.com/page-448
For example, if Armadillo plc has been carrying out a contract to supply an insurance company with IT services and then loses the contract to Bear Ltd, Bear Limited will not only take over the contract to supply IT services, but will also inherit all the employees of Armadillo plc who were formerly involved in supplying the IT services to the insurance company. If Armadillo plc has failed to pay its employees their wages for the past few weeks, Bear Limited will inherit the liability to the employees for the unpaid wages under TUPE.

see also...
http://www.berr.gov.uk/files/file20761.pdf
which states...."The new employer cannot pick and choose which employees to take on..."

http://www.acas.org.uk/index.aspx?articleid=1655
Which transfers are not covered?
TUPE does not apply to:

transfers by share take-over because, when a company's shares are sold to new shareholders, there is no transfer of the business: the same company continues to be the employer
transfer of assets only (eg the sale of equipment alone wouldn't be covered but the sale of a going concern including equipment would be covered)
transfer of a contract to provide goods or services where this doesn't involve the transfer of a business or part of a business
transfers of undertakings situated outside the UK

Hope this hasnt confused matters for you.



Not rated yet
Rate this!
3 Oct 2008 3:21AM

Anne McAllister
Member - 166 posts

Have a look at....http://www.surgerydoor.co.uk/so/detail2.asp?level2=Broken%20Ankle%20-%20Open%20Reduction%20and%20Fixation
"How soon you can return to work depends on your job. If you sit whilst at work, you will be able to return to work two or three weeks after your operation. This also depends on you being able to get to work. If your job is manual you will be unable to work for at least three months. "
You would however have to consider things like stairs (at work) and obviously how hes going to get there and back so theres litle point in harrassing him until hes declared fit to return or you have a suitable policy in place.
Would his manager work with a broken ankle?



Not rated yet
Rate this!
3 Oct 2008 3:05AM

Anne McAllister
Member - 166 posts

Before trying to stop this practice it may be helpful to ask why this happens and for how long it has been going on?
Custom and practice may already be established and the employees will not take kindly to a one sided imposition .
Is there an issue with a lack of appropriate facilities in the area?
Does it work out too expensive to have a break anywhere else?
As with any proposed changes ..gently does it.
Consult and negotiate an amicable agreement.
Explain your concerns and ask for suggestions.
If you cant agree on it you may changethings, following consultation giving a months notice in writing.



Not rated yet
Rate this!
3 Oct 2008 2:51AM

Anne McAllister
Member - 166 posts

Im confused now.
If someone is on holiday they are already getting paid (holiday pay) so are not losing money by being sick.
Therefore it cant be paid through sick pay.
What they are losing is days (depending on your interpretation)



Not rated yet
Rate this!
3 Oct 2008 2:44AM

Anne McAllister
Member - 166 posts

Alls well that ends well ?
Assuming shes not gone to post her ET application then?



Disclaimer

The forums are designed as a discussion area for employers and managers to exchange ideas and information, or to ask and answer questions posed by other members of the Workplace Law Network.

Please don't abuse the forums by asking questions about personal issues or by overtly promoting commercial goods and services.

We impose upon all participants the obligation to comply with our terms and conditions» but cannot guarantee that all participants will do so.

Please note that the Workplace Law Network is not able to assert editorial control or ensure moderation over the forum section of the site, and you participate at your own risk.



Fully updated for 2009
Upload your image
View my:
  • Profile
  • Downloads
  • Scrapbook
  • Order history

My messages0 (0)Shop

  • Premium membership trial

    7 days instant access to membership with no strings attached.

  • 1 minute tour

    See what the Network has to offer in just 60 seconds.

  • Membership quotamator

    Build your own membership quote online!

  • Recommend membership
  • Print friendly version

AWARDS

  • ppa logo
  • aop logo
  • Absence
  • Accidents at work
  • Alcohol/drugs
  • Asbestos
  • Building regulations
  • Bullying/harassment
  • Business continuity
  • Business regulation
  • Buying and selling property
  • Catering
  • CCTV & employee monitoring
  • Confined spaces
  • Construction
  • Consultation
  • Contract workers
  • Contracts, employment
  • Contracts, facilities management
  • Corporate killing
  • Data protection
  • Directors' responsibilities
  • Disability
  • Disciplinary, Grievance, Dismissal
  • Discrimination
  • Display screen equipment
  • Driving at work
  • Electrical safety
  • Energy management
  • Environment management
  • Fire safety
  • First aid
  • Fleet management
  • Flexible working
  • Fuel storage
  • Gas safety
  • Hazardous substances
  • Health and safety
  • Health, surveillance
  • Height, working at
  • Holidays
  • Homeworking
  • Human resources
  • Human rights
  • Insurance
  • Intellectual property
  • Internet and email
  • Landlord and tenant
  • Legionella
  • Lighting
  • Lone working
  • Manual handling
  • Maternity, paternity, adoption
  • Minimum wage
  • Money laundering
  • Mothers, new and expectant
  • Nebosh Certificate
  • Noise
  • Outsourcing
  • Parking
  • Pensions and benefits
  • Permits to work
  • Personal protective equipment
  • Pest control
  • Planning procedures
  • Pollution
  • Property management
  • Radiation
  • Rates and revaluation
  • Recruitment and selection
  • Redundancy
  • Security
  • Signage
  • Smoking
  • Stress
  • Trade unions
  • TUPE
  • Vehicles
  • Ventilation, temperature
  • Violence
  • Waste management
  • Welfare facilities
  • Whistleblowing
  • Work equipment
  • Working time
  • About us
  • Privacy policy
  • Contact us
  • Terms and conditions
  • Accessibility
  • Careers
  • Membership
  • Sitemap
  • NEBOSH certificate
  • IOSH
Promotion code: None

Valid XHTML 1.0 Transitional

© Copyright Workplace Law Group Ltd 1995-2009