Workplace Law Network The membership site for UK employers and managers, specialising in employment law, health and safety and premises management
Only a few places left on this year's must attend facilities management conference
PPA awards Workplace Law business website of the year (paid for)
  • NETWORK
  • TRAINING
  • CONSULTING
  • BOOKSHOP
  • HOME
    • ABOUT MEMBERSHIP
    • ABOUT US
  • LATEST
    • NEWS
    • CASES
    • BRIEFINGS
    • AUDIO
    • EBULLETINS
    • WHAT THE PAPERS SAY
    • NETWORK NEWS
  • INFO CENTRE
    • WHITE PAPERS
    • FACTSHEETS
    • MAGAZINE
    • POLICIES & PROCEDURES
    • SPECIAL REPORTS
    • GUIDES
    • REGULATION FINDER
  • ADVICE CENTRE
    • ONLINE ADVICE
    • TELEPHONE ADVICE
  • FORUMS & GROUPS
    • FORUMS
    • GROUPS
  • MEMBERSHIP
    • MY PROFILE
    • SPECIAL OFFERS
    • MEMBERSHIP STATUS
  • SHOP
  • CONTACT
  • LOG IN
  • or Register now
  • You are here:
  • Network
  • Membership
  • /magazine

Identity charade

Workplace Law Magazine is available only to Premium Members of the Workplace Law Network. Produced 10 times each year, it is distributed in hard copy format in the first week of the month, and is also available online.

  • Latest issue: August 2008
  • Back issues

March 2008
Issue: 40




Download this
issue now!
Pdf

Identity charade

When recruiting, should you pick the person who has the right skills and experience for the job, or concentrate on getting the right ‘mix’ of ‘types’ of employee – thereby selecting your candidate because they are, for example, Asian rather than because their skills match the role most closely?

Might sound like a ridiculous question with a very obvious answer for most employers, considering the needs of their business during the recruitment process.

It is, however, the kind of dilemma that employers could realistically face once the Equality Bill comes into force. The Government has stressed that, contrary to frequently published opinion, the new Bill will not permit employers to promote one candidate over another when they are “less suitable”, but that it will allow employers to consider addressing under-representation should they ‘choose to’.

This ambiguous position could quite feasibly leave employers wondering whether to err on the side of caution, or not. What is the likelihood of having two candidates apply for a role, who are precisely matched in their suitability for the role, except that one is black and one is white? If this was the case, the employer would surely opt for the black person — being the minority — in order to ensure they establish an appropriate ‘mix’ of employees in their workforce?

Where candidates are less closely matched in their skills and experience, but both are feasible and, again, one is black and one is white, employers may well feel that in order to avoid discrimination claims they would be safest to opt for the person in the minority group.

It’s hardly about ‘choosing’ to address under-representation — it’s about doing what you feel you have to in order to comply with the law, and trying to balance this with the needs of your business.

In this issue...

06 Legal calendar

Key legislative dates taking place in September and October.

08 Case law

  • Landmark case rules discriminatory pay protection unlawful
  • Student wins right to wear Kara bangle

Comment

07 Equality and diversity – what’s the difference?

Some diversity policies can unwittingly undermine equality by re-enforcing stereotypes, says Amy Bird.

17 The Equality Bill– chucking all discrimination in the same bag

The Equality Bill will bring together 116 pieces of legislation – are the provisions workable, asks Richard Nicolle.

Focus

10 One of each?

The new Equality Bill is set to extend ‘positive action’ so that employers can consider which groups are under-represented in their workforce when recruiting. But will this redress any imbalances or will it lead to employers trying to obtain ‘one of each’ in their workforce, regardless of talent? Claire Fuller investigates.

14 Discriminated against for someone else’s disability: the Coleman case

European Court of Justice (ECJ) has ruled Sharon Coleman’s employer discriminated against her because her son was disabled. If the ruling is applied in UK law, what could this mean for employers of other carers? Luke Tapp and John Macaulay of Greenwoods Solicitors investigate.

18 Transparency to cause friction in your workplace?

The new Equality Bill will contain measures to make companies more transparent because “we cannot tackle inequality if it is hidden”. But will publicising inequalities in workplaces cause problems for employers? Claire Fuller spoke to the Solicitor General, Vera Baird MP.

22 Employing deaf people: the Donaldson's school example

Taking on deaf staff presents several practical and legal challenges, but as the Donaldson School in Scotland illustrates perfectly, these can be effectively overcome through consultation. Sheila Gunn, Partner at Shepherd + Wedderburn, reports.

Network

24 The first woman in FM

An opportunity to work on some of the most exciting developments in the world proved too good to turn down for Facilities Manager Jane Stevens. KellyMansfield discovers how she is living up to the challenge of being the first woman in FM for a renowned Dubaian development firm.

26 Clinic

Workplace Law members ask the experts for advice on pay matters.

Technical

28 Legal update

In-depth technical guidance on: appearance-based discrimination; transsexuals and the Equality Bill; and office adaptations for pregnant workers.

The data

32 This month’s statistics

Key figures and information on health and safety and employment law.

 


No. Date of Issue Title
43 Aug 2008 2009: new beginnings
42 Jun 2008 Reality bites: managing in a recession
41 Feb 2008 Euromillions
40 Mar 2008 Identity charade
39 Oct 2008 Evacuation versus invacuation
38 May 2008 Perk of the job? Managing the risks faced by loneworkers
37 May 2008 Employment law is changing - but don't tell anyone how
36 Jul 2008 Have we binned your Workplace Law Magazine?
35 Feb 2008 Killing time
34 Jan 2008 Health hazards: keeping a lid on panic
33 Jan 2008 "We don't serve wheelchairs"
32 Aug 2007 3 strikes and your fire's not out!
31 Oct 2007 Facefacts: The real cost of social networking to your business
30 Jan 2007 How much does it cost to kill someone at work?
29 Jan 2007 Employment Tribunals: back to the future?
28 Jan 2007 Smoking ban special
27 May 2007 Contractors: are you watching them?
26 Jan 2007 Occupational health: an unnecessary expense?
25 Jan 2007 CDM special
24 Jan 2007 Energy management special issue
23 Jan 2006 What is reasonable adjustment?
22 Jan 2006 £20 if you can prove you’re competent
21 Jan 2006 London’s burning, where’s the engine?
20 Jan 2006 R v. Beckingham: case closed
19 Jan 2006 Mug’s game? Excessive risk aversion
18 Jan 2006 Licence to… protect your workplace?
17 Jan 2006 The sex issue
16 Jan 2006 Has the HSE lost its bite?
15 Jan 2006 H5N1 Bird Flu: Are you playing chicken with your company’s future?
14 Jan 2006 Old git, or still work fit?
13 Jan 2005 The year of living dangerously
12 Jan 2005 The burning issue
11 Jan 2005 Disability access: is it becoming clear yet?
10 Jan 2005 Business as usual? London bomb blasts
9 Jan 2005 Who's looking at you?
8 Jan 2005 Legionella trial special
7 Jan 2005 Religious beliefs: should employers cater for all faiths?
6 Jan 2005 No smoking? Employers face the costs of kicking the habit
5 Jan 2005 Playing with numbers: TUPE special issue
4 Jan 2005 Directors' responsibilities for health and safety
3 Dec 2004 2005: getting to grips with the legal year ahead
2 Jan 2004 Stress management special
1 Jan 2004 Face facts: how much do you really know about disability legislation?

SEARCHING WORKPLACE LAW MAGAZINE

You can search the content of the above magazine issues by using the site search above and using the refine search panel to narrow down your results.

If you have a four-digit search code from the hard copy magazine, please enter it below.


Fully updated for 2009

AUDIO

23 Sep 2008 2:07PM

The Heyday challenge - what does this mean for the retirement age?

Workplace Law's senior HR consultant, David Wollcott, answers questions on what the Advocate Gene...

Listen now

BRIEFINGS

7 Jan 2009 2:48PM

Homophobic discrimination in the spotlight

Sexual orientation discrimination and harassment in employment has been unlawful for over three y...

Read more

CASES

7 Jan 2009 9:58AM

Compulsory retirement at 65 must be justified, says EAT

Partners in a business can be forced to retire at 65, or at an earlier age, but only when justifi...

Read more

EBULLETINS

20 Nov 2008 4:28PM

The Employment Bill becomes the Employment Act

The Employment Bill has received Royal Assent and has become the Employment Act 2008.

Read more

NETWORK NEWS

13 Oct 2008 10:08AM

Workplace Law to deliver CIPD accredited courses in London

Workplace Law Training has been awarded approval to deliver accredited HR training courses in cen...

Read more

NEWS

7 Jan 2009 2:13PM

Employers blast Benylin ‘throw a sickie’ advert

Employers’ groups have hit out at an advert for a cold and flu medicine because it encourag...

Read more

WHAT THE PAPERS SAY

6 Jan 2009 2:14PM

Lewis Hamilton's 'bully' boss branded a racist at Employment Tribunal

Lewis Hamilton's boss has been branded a racist and a bully during an Employment Tribunal. McLare...

Read more

Upload your image
View my:
  • Profile
  • Downloads
  • Scrapbook
  • Order history

My messages0 (0)Shop

  • Premium membership trial

    7 days instant access to membership with no strings attached.

  • 1 minute tour

    See what the Network has to offer in just 60 seconds.

  • Membership quotamator

    Build your own membership quote online!

  • Recommend membership
  • Print friendly version

AWARDS

  • ppa logo
  • aop logo
  • Absence
  • Accidents at work
  • Alcohol/drugs
  • Asbestos
  • Building regulations
  • Bullying/harassment
  • Business continuity
  • Business regulation
  • Buying and selling property
  • Catering
  • CCTV & employee monitoring
  • Confined spaces
  • Construction
  • Consultation
  • Contract workers
  • Contracts, employment
  • Contracts, facilities management
  • Corporate killing
  • Data protection
  • Directors' responsibilities
  • Disability
  • Disciplinary, Grievance, Dismissal
  • Discrimination
  • Display screen equipment
  • Driving at work
  • Electrical safety
  • Energy management
  • Environment management
  • Fire safety
  • First aid
  • Fleet management
  • Flexible working
  • Fuel storage
  • Gas safety
  • Hazardous substances
  • Health and safety
  • Health, surveillance
  • Height, working at
  • Holidays
  • Homeworking
  • Human resources
  • Human rights
  • Insurance
  • Intellectual property
  • Internet and email
  • Landlord and tenant
  • Legionella
  • Lighting
  • Lone working
  • Manual handling
  • Maternity, paternity, adoption
  • Minimum wage
  • Money laundering
  • Mothers, new and expectant
  • Nebosh Certificate
  • Noise
  • Outsourcing
  • Parking
  • Pensions and benefits
  • Permits to work
  • Personal protective equipment
  • Pest control
  • Planning procedures
  • Pollution
  • Property management
  • Radiation
  • Rates and revaluation
  • Recruitment and selection
  • Redundancy
  • Security
  • Signage
  • Smoking
  • Stress
  • Trade unions
  • TUPE
  • Vehicles
  • Ventilation, temperature
  • Violence
  • Waste management
  • Welfare facilities
  • Whistleblowing
  • Work equipment
  • Working time
  • About us
  • Privacy policy
  • Contact us
  • Terms and conditions
  • Accessibility
  • Careers
  • Membership
  • Sitemap
  • NEBOSH certificate
  • IOSH
Promotion code: None

Valid XHTML 1.0 Transitional

© Copyright Workplace Law Group Ltd 1995-2009